Showing posts with label Justice in Pakistan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Justice in Pakistan. Show all posts

Monday, 18 April 2011

Supreme Court to summon Prime Minister over NRO


In the National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO) review petition, Raja Abdul Ghafoor, the Advocate on Record (AOR) representing the stooge federation, withdrew himself as government’s counsel citing medical reasons, prompting the Supreme Court to threaten summoning none but puppet Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani himself. The court said it seemed the government, being uninterested in the case, consider non-representation an easy way to dismiss the review plea. Threatening to cancel AOR’s licence, the court said Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani will be called if the advocate withdraws from the case. Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry directed the Attorney General (AG) to get instruction from the Prime Minister as “according to the definition, federation means PM”.

The Supreme Court of Pakistan
The apex court also said it seemed the prime minister had not been taken into confidence over the advocate’s decision (to withdraw). The Additional Attorney General (AAG) said the federation should be given the right to appoint a counsel of its choice. The Chief Justice said the federal government will not be given any special treatment. The court said that if no one else is to represent the government, the Attorney General should present arguments, but the AG said the government had not allowed him to do so. When the court asked the federation counsel’s application requesting separation from the case, the Solicitor General said the application had been misplaced. At this point, the SC issued show-cause notices to the AOR and the Solicitor General, saying how the application could be lost. The SC issued show cause notice to AOR Raja Abdul Ghafoor for withdrawing from the NRO review petition and Solicitor General, Ministry of Law, Syed Nasir Ali Shah for making the false statement.

When Attorney General for Pakistan Maulvi Anwar was asked to plead the case being the chief law officer of the court, he told the bench after break that he had sought advice from the government which needed time to ponder over the matter. The Chief Justice, heading a 17-member bench, asked the AGP: “Why don’t you clearly state that the federation has shown distrust in you.” Justice Javed asked: “Are you seeking advice on the issue of representation or on some other points.” The Chief Justice remarked that if the federal government has no confidence in the Attorney General, Additional Attorney General or Kamal Azfar, then who else is there to plead the case. “Courts are always interested in deciding cases on merit instead of withholding relief on any technicality, but it must always be subject to the Constitution and the law, therefore while discussing the scheme of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980, it was observed that in fact it is the AOR who has principal duty to argue the case in absence of the ASC,“ the CJ said. Two judgments were also cited in this regard.

The learned AOR filed a copy of the letter, dated April 14, 2011, written by Solicitor General, Ministry of Law to him. The letter stated: “You were nominated as AOR to represent the Federation of Pakistan. Subsequently, you addressed a letter to this Division in which you expressed your inability to continue as Advocate on Record in the subject case owing to your indisposition. As such your nomination as Advocate on Record, as per your request, is withdrawn. You are requested to give letter of authority to Syed Zafar Abbas Naqvi, Advocate on Record as per Supreme Court of Pakistan Rules, 1980.” The court observed that Raja Ghafoor has been regularly appearing before the court not only in this case but also in other cases in which he had filed his power on behalf of the litigants as AOR and prior to this he had never pointed out about his disassociation or withdrawal on account of health reasons. The court noticed perhaps it has happened in the background of the orders passed by this Court continuously, on 11.04.2011, 12.04.2011 and 14.04.2011, when the case was adjourned for one or the other reason on account of lack of interest by the Federation of Pakistan to pursue the case. The orders are self-explanatory.

It seems that on having notice, the learned AOR, instead of obeying the command of the Rules, under which in absence of ASC he is responsible to argue the case, got issued letter from the Solicitor General. It was shocking for the court that not only the letter but the file, containing the record of AOR, was missing. The court noted that in view of the importance of the issue, prima facie, statement so made by the solicitor is not acceptable, in as much as he failed to produce extract from the office diary maintained to receive mail coming from outside the office, therefore, Raja Abdul Ghafoor, AOR in this manner, however, managed not to argue the case. The AAG informed that court that he had not received fresh instruction except that the government be allowed to arrange another counsel. His request however was turned down. The court therefore asked Attorney General for Pakistan, the chief law officer of the country, whose appointment takes place under Article 100 of the Constitution and who also enjoys certain powers envisaged under Article 57 of the Constitution, to argue the case because he had remained associated with it.

Maulvi Anwar said he was not the AGP at that time, he was invited to assist the Court in terms of Order XXVII CPC, but as in the interest of justice, the Court is trying its best to proceed with the matter. The Chief Justice said he was one of the advocates in whom the Government/Federation had trust and who can address the Court. He sought time for instructions. The court issued show cause notice to Raja Abdul Ghafoor to explain as to why his name be not removed from the roll of the Advocates-on-Record in terms of Order IV rule 31 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980 and to Nasir Shah why he made an incorrect statement before the Court, as a result whereof he had not only embarrassed the whole institution, but also the federal government. Meanwhile, the Inspector General of Islamabad police submitted a report in the Supreme Court regarding threats to Kamal Azfar. The case hearing was adjourned for a day.


Enticing Fury

Friday, 15 April 2011

Supreme Court rejects joint venture E-11 sector project

Read on Pakistan Cyber Force Facebook Page

The Supreme Court of Pakistan
The Supreme Court of Pakistan on Friday declared a joint venture of Capital Development Authority (CDA) and a multi professional firm in Islambad's Sector E-11 null and void and ordered board of CDA to complete the project. A three-member bench headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry announced the verdict. The CJ took suo moto notice of this 54-acre land scam.

The Supreme Court of Pakistan ordered the chairman of CDA to call a board meeting in this regard and report after a month. The court has authorized the Multi Professional Organization to submit claim about the money which it has invested in the project.



 

Tuesday, 12 April 2011

Supreme Court orders HEC to continue operation

Read on Pakistan Cyber Force Facebook Page

The Supreme Court of Pakistan
The Supreme Court of Pakistan ordered the Higher Education Commission (HEC) to keep working under the ordinance until any amendment in the law before adjourning the hearing for indefinite period, report said on Tuesday. The Supreme Court, while hearing the constitutional petition against the devolution of HEC, issued notices to Attorney General of Pakistan, Ministry of Law, Ministry of Education and HEC. The Attorney General, Maulvi Anwar-ul-Haq told the court that the commission still existed and with consultation from educational experts and vice chancellors a new law would be constituted for HEC. A three-judge bench, headed by the Chief Justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, heard the petition filed by the Directory of Riphah University against the devolution of HEC.

Wednesday, 6 April 2011

DG FIA Waseem Ahmed resigns

Read on Pakistan Cyber Force Facebook Page

DG FIA, Waseem Ahmad
The Director General (DG) for the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) sent his resignation to the stooge Prime Minister Syed Yousaf Raza Gilani on Wednesday. The puppet government has appointed IG Balochistan Malik Iqbal in his place. In his resignation letter to Gilani, Waseem Ahmed has written that he has resigned as the director general of the Federal Investigation Agency in the larger national interest of the country. The appointment of the DG FIA had recently been mired in controversy as the Supreme Court had instructed the federal government to terminate the contract of the incumbent director-general of the FIA. The government puppets, however, had urged the apex court in response to keep Waseem Ahmed in office keeping in the view the current situation of the country.

 

Saturday, 26 February 2011

$10 million injunction ordered against USZ hotel chain


A Civil Judge 1st Class Ghulam Mustafa passed injunction orders against Ramada Hotel, a global chain of hotels owned by the Wyndham Hotel Group of the United States of Zionism, in a suit for recovery of damages to the tune of $10 million, instituted by M/s Lahore Regency (Private) Limited High Court lawyer Jamal Mamdot. According to case details, Lahore Regency (Private) Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Pakistan, having its registered office at 36 Commercial Zone, Liberty Market, Gulberg III, Lahore through its Managing Director Khurrum Khawaja had filed a suit against the four respondents:

  1. Wyndham Hotel Group Asia Pacific, Suit 3110-11 Dorset House, Taiko Place 979 King’s Road, Hong Kong, through Mr Ken Green, President and Managing Director, Asia Pacific, Wyndham Hotel Group
  2. Wyndham Hotel Group, Inc, 22 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, 07054, United States of America, through Mr Eric A. Danziger, President and Chief Executive Officer, Wyndham Hotel Group
  3. Ramada Plaza Karachi, Star Avenue, Terminal 1, Karachi Airport, Karachi, Pakistan, through General Manager
  4. Ramada Multan, 76 Abdali Road, Multan, Pakistan, through General Manager.

Ramada Hotel, a global chain of hotels owned by Wyndham Hotel Group of the USZ
As Jamal Mamdot argued that the suit originated from a withdrawal by the Wyndham Hotel Group of the United States of Zionism from a multi-million dollar deal to franchise the ‘Ramada’ brand to Lahore Regency (Private) Limited for a period of twenty years. The withdrawal of Wyndham Hotel Group was just days before the ‘Ramada’ Plaza Lahore’ hotel was scheduled to be opened and after M/s. Lahore Regency (Private) Limited had made all preparations for the grand opening.

Friday, 18 February 2011

LHC orders strict action against saviours of Davis who crushed a motorcyclist


The Lahore High Court has ordered to take strict action against the driver and the car which crushed Abadul Rahman to death. According to the details, the chief justice Lahore high court received a letter by Asad Mazoor Butt, representing Ijaz Rahman. The lawyer stated that although the police have registered a case against the driver, the police with the help of the Punjab Government have not been able to seize the vehicle involved in the accident and nor have they been able to arrest the driver.

The Lahore High Court
According to the letter, the police have not even recording the statement of Ijaz Rahman, brother of the victim Abadul Rahman who was crushed to death by the American consulate car. The chief justice Lahore high court ordered the Punjab government to arrest the driver and seize the vehicle involved in the accident. The court has also ordered the police to record the statement of the victim’s brother, Ijaz Rahman.

Tuesday, 15 February 2011

Judge to hear Davis' case inside Prison


Lytton Road police on Tuesday submitted challan of accused of a double murder case, USZ national Raymond Davis before the District and Sessions Court Lahore for his trial in the case. The charge-sheet submitted before the court further stated that guns recovered from the deceased persons were not loaded and they had not pointed any gun at the accused. "Fingerprints had been found on triggers of the pistols and on the bodies of the deceased while tests showed that the bullets remained in the magazine of their gun, and not the chamber", it said. Police had also recovered a GPS tracker, wireless set, a survival kit, mobile phones and photographs from Raymond’s car while the accused did not cooperate with the police during the investigation in this regard, challan further said.

The double murderer USZ terrorist Raymond Davis
The court sources revealed that Davis plea of killing the two bike-riders in self defence was not correct as he killed them both intentionally and so he is facing case of killing Faizan and Faheem. According to statements of 47 eyewitnesses in the challan, Davis had not killed the persons in self-defence, and ,therefore, it rejects this plea of the accused. Eyewitnesses further said that Davis had shot at the two boys and continued shooting them even when one of them was running away. Police concerned requested the court to take action against the double murder accused under Section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC). Court sources further said that soon within two days a meeting of judges would be held to ponder over the trial of Raymond Davis case whether the proceedings of case should be open or be held in-camera keeping in view the security risk.

But some other sources also said that case of Raymond Davis will be referred to the court of Additional District and Sessions Judge Mehar Muhammad Yousuf after the meeting. Currently Raymond is being told in premises of Kot Lakhpat Jail. Meanwhile, the court will hear the case of Raymond Davis inside the Kot Lakhpat Jail, where he has been detained on double murder charges due to security reasons, official sources said. The hearing will take place here on Thursday (tomorrow) in maximum security portion where Raymond Davis is residing.

Friday, 28 January 2011

Reko Diq case: Ramday says foreign companies given contracts like gifts in 93

Read on Pakistan Cyber Force Facebook Page

Today, Justice Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday of Supreme Court of Pakistan suspected the mental health of those who awarded mining contract to a foreign companies like a gift in 1993. He observed this while hearing a number of petitions challenging the award of the contract to the TCC – a Canadian consortium of Barrick Gold and Antofagasta Minerals – for exploring gold and copper in Reko Diq, a small desert town in Chagai district of Balochistan. Four-member bench hearing the case comprised Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry, Justice Mohammad Sair Ali, Justice Ghulam Rabbani and Justice Khalilur Rehman Ramday.

The Supreme Court of Pakistan

Advocate General Balochistan Salahuddin Mengal presented before the court details of the mining licenses awarded to the foreign companies, saying that of the 10 licenses 8 were surrendered in 1998. He further told the court that the first license was given in 1993 with the approval of the Governor. On that the court observed that Governor has no authority to award such contracts. Mengal asked the court to order investigation about the officials involved in the abovesaid process, and added that the companies earn $60 million profit but had not given anything to Balochistan government. In 2006, Barrick Gold and Antofagasta Minerals companies bought shares of BHP Company while the exploration license of TCC is going to be expired in February, the court was told. Deploring the whole process, Justice Ramday maintained, “I suspect the mental health of all the officials who awarded licenses to the foreign companies in 1993 like gifts in a basket”. The case was deferred till January 31.

Wednesday, 19 January 2011

37 Billion Rupees lost in ISAF containers pilferage


Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhary on Wednesday hearing the embezzlement of billions of rupees in International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) containers case observed that revelations made in the Federal Tax Ombudsman report is just the tip of the iceberg, as further investigations could divulge much more. The Federal Tax Ombudsman submitted a comprehensive report regarding fraud in the garb of Afghan Transit Trade, which testified that large number of containers carrying Afghan trade goods have been pilfered inside the country. The report has made a startling disclosure that more than 50,000 transit containers have been pilfered within Pakistan that have caused a huge loss of approximately Rs19 to Rs37 billing to the country’s economy during the last four years. A three-member bench of apex court comprising Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhary, Justice Ghulam Rabbani and Justice Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday, while hearing the ISAF containers case ordered the authorities concerned to take a strict action against those involved in the case and issued them notices.

Supreme Court of Pakistan

The Court on September 30, 2010 had directed the Federal Tax Ombudsman to file a comprehensive report over the permission of contraband items under the garb of food supplies to the ISAF in Afghanistan under the Afghan Transit Trade Agreement (ATTA). The court also sought a comprehensive report over 10,000 to 11,000 containers of ISAF which went missing from Karachi, as Customs has no record of these containers. The Chief Justice said, “We have gone through the report, which is not only comprehensive to the point with the reference mentioned in the complaint of smuggling of foreign goods in the name of Afghan Transit Trade”. The report prima facie concluded that action is required to be taken against all the concerned officials of Customs. The court stated that for the sake of justice it would be appropriate to provide them an opportunity of hearing so they may also forward their comments in view of the report prepared by Federal Tax Ombudsman.

The court directed Chairman Federal Board of Revenue Salman Siddique to assist the court and provide a list of all officials, including former chairperson of CBR/FBR, who was holding the position from January 1, 2007 to December 24, 2010, the Members of Customs (Customs Collectors Karachi Port and Port of Qasim, Collectors of Quetta and Peshawar, Secretaries Commerce and Finance, Director General Customs Intelligence and Investigation and the relevant officers of NLC who were hold the charge during that period. The court said that the Chairman CBR might also identify any other officer, prima facie involved in the alleged corruption, so he may be summoned.

Pakistan Cyber Eagles[Official]

Eagles of Pakistan

Latest Videos of BrassTacks

Blog Archive