Showing posts with label Zionist deception. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Zionist deception. Show all posts

Monday, 2 May 2011

Zaid Hamid on Osama Bin Laden death hoax

Zionist jester Obama unrolls “Osama Circus” in a desperate effort to escape Afghanistan

Read on Pakistan Cyber Force Facebook Page

Zionist stooge Barack Obama
Announcing the death of none other than CIA's very own terror boogieman organization al-Qaeda's chief Osama bin Laden in an operation, Zionist puppet Barack Obama kept alive his tradition of telling extraordinarily shameful ball faced lies and said that counter terrorism cooperation with Pakistan led the USZ to location of the militant leader’s hiding. In a statement, Obama said he also spoke to puppet President of Pakistan, Zardari on Sunday night. After spitting out a bunch of big fat lies, he continued and said what he really intended to say i.e., it is essential that Pakistan continues to join the United States of Zionism in the fight against “al-Qaeda” and its affiliates. The announcement was made by Obama from the East Room of the White House while a crowd of New World Order mindless zombies gathered outside and cheered the sloppy package of lies and outrageous disinformation delivered by their drone president. According to Obama, Bin Laden was killed after a firefight, and his body was taken into custody. An interesting thing to note here is that not a single live footage was shown despite wasting world's so called “number 1 terrorist” after a lapse of 10 years. Above all, the heinous joke has been comprehensively exposed now by multiple sources who have exposed the fake image that was released earlier by Dailymail.


Mr. Obama, don't worry because your country will not be able to run away from Graveyard of Empires in one piece. Not at all.

We urge our readers to Watch these videos:


Thursday, 24 February 2011

Al-Jazeera's Big Fat Lies about Libya's air-bombardment busted


Khaled Al Ga'aeem, Libya's deputy foreign minister phoned Al Jazeera on Monday night to deny charges of violence and expose Al-Jazeera's big fat lies about Libya's air bombardment. Khaled Al Ga’aeem, under-secretary of the Libyan foreign ministry, phoned the Israhelli owned Al Jazeera on Monday evening and fortunately he was put live on air.  Here is an exact translation of the conversation that followed.
Al-Jazeera, an Israhelli lie factory
Al Jazeera: With us now is Khaled Gaeem, under-secretary of the foreign ministry. What’s your comment on what happened today in Libya?

Khaled Al Ga’aeem: Good evening, the reason I am calling is to seek the truth and only the truth. I want to stress two facts to the viewers in the Arab nation - and especially to Libyans inside and outside Libya. And I take personal and full responsibility, and I am ready - not only to resign from my post - but also to set myself on fire in the Green Square if my words are proven as lies and it is confirmed that there were mercenaries from African states coming by planes and if it is confirmed that there was aerial bombardment. I asked the British ambassador to be a witness and to bring a media crew tomorrow morning to tour all Tripoli to look for find any aftermath of aerial bombardment or discriminate bombardment. I will bear full responsibility and I will pay with my life as a price for it.

AJ: Sir, allow me…

KAG [interrupts]: Al Jazeera is trying to burn Libya ... Al Jazeera is far from professional…

AJ [interrupts]: Allow me, allow me… Before you asked the British to bring in a crew, why wouldn’t you allow Al Jazeera to send a crew in. We have a priority over the British. Would you allow a TV crew from Al Jazeera to come in?

KAG: Until Al Jazeera proves the opposite, we trust a foreign channel more then we trust an Arab channel. I invited Al Arabiya channel as well, and will call them shortly to ask them to come to Tripoli.  CNN, I put this challenge on the ground… If there’s any aftermath of bombardment found…

AJ [interrupts]: You spoke about CNN, Al Arabiya and the British - let me speak, so you can hear one other. You asked all them to come - but my question was clear: Will you allow a crew from Al Jazeera to come and look and report what we see?

KAG: Al Jazeera should prove its professionalism first, then we will invite it after tomorrow. Al Jazeera’s professionalism is at stake.

AJ second anchor: What about the pictures we saw screened on Al Jazeera? Aren’t these pictures and videos evidence of what’s happening in Libya?

KAG: Tomorrow you will see live pictures from foreign media outlets from around Tripoli, and crews will go to Benghazi. In Benghazi, the situation is different from Tripoli. There are groups of people, like brother Saif al-Islam [Gaddafi’s eldest son] said: Groups have demands and we understand it - and I personally don’t see any problem with peaceful demonstrations and calling for any demand. But, when people attack bases and seize weapons to terrify civilians and our soldiers…

AJ [interrupts]: But sir, “the situation is different from Tripoli to Benghazi”? Do you deny that massacres by the regime took place in Benghazi?

KAG: Benghazi didn’t witness massacres by the state. There were mistakes by policemen, and I personally as a citizen, and not as a public servant, hold policemen who used excessive force to account - and they tried to justify it as self-defense when protesters attacked and tried to burn police stations. But I support the investigation that Saif al-Islam announced today, with a judge heading a committee.


AJ: What guarantees are there for this investigation to be honest?

KAG: The Libyan judiciary is honest and judges in Libya are independent, and as evidence they not always get along with the executive authorities. They are educated and hold high degrees from abroad … I beg everyone to listen to the voice of the brain to keep our development, maintain the country and the lives of the people. Who will win? If Al Jazeera did this act, will Qatar or the employees of Al Jazeera win?

AJ: Allow me sir: Libyan ambassadors in a number of Arab capitals have resigned because they were watching Al Jazeera?

KAG: No, no. never.

AJ: Then explain to me … Your ambassadors around the world resigned because they watched Al Jazeera?

KAG: I spoke to the brothers and the head of our mission in New York, Abdelrahmnan Shelgum, and I told him to invite a crew from CNN - and that the brothers who spoke from the mission about massacres in Tripoli, and other areas, should wait and see after the crew can go on a tour.

AJ: So you say CNN is welcome and you have arranged a tour in all of Libya, yet we are forbidden? You gave certificates of good conduct to all channels but Al Jazeera? So all channels in the world are good, and you gave them a certificate of endorsement, apart from Al Jazeera?

KAG: Al Jazeera’s professionalism is at stake

AJ: If the professionalism of Al Jazeera is so bad, why are you talking to us?

KAG: I speak to you, because you spread rumours. I personally beg you...

AJ: This is another reason: If we are not fair and make things up, why don’t you let us go there and report?

KAG: Please allow me, this is a historic responsibility - me and you will not live for ever - this life is not for ever. We have a responsibility before our people and the nation, please try to look for accuracy. You said Gaddafi left to Venezuela – but each person who travels in a private plane needs a plan and permission.

AJ: We didn’t say that, that information came from officials like British FM and some Libyan diplomats. How do you explain the resignation of the justice minister?

KAG: I haven’t heard until this moment that he had resigned. For your information, I will call him to check.

AJ: This news was covered by all media. A minister resigns and you tell us you haven’t heard about it?

KAG: I swear by my honour - and by Allah - that I haven’t heard it.

AJ: Allow me, because frankly I didn’t fully digest your answers and the call to media apart from Al Jazeera. I stress once again, if Al Jazeera was giving the wrong picture, if we exaggerate and fabricate, then it’s a priority to invite us rather than other channels - and since you are talking to us, this is an evidence that you think this is an influential channel.
Let us in and we promise to reflect what we see. Will you allow this crew? We will have correspondents and we will not allow or give a chance to anyone to fabricate because we will see things with our own teams. Will you allow us in and guarantee the safety of our crew? We will be there tomorrow.

KAG: [Not] until Al Jazeera proves itself otherwise.


AJ second anchor: OK sir, you asked to speak to Al Jazeera now, this is what I understand, that you demanded to appear live on Al Jazeera. So if you don’t trust us, why did you ask to be on our air?

KAG: I am here in Tripoli, and you could hear if there was bombardment

AJ: This, frankly, wasn’t what I asked you. I asked you a clear and direct question. Why are you talking to us now?

KAG: I asked to speak to you out of anger and sorrow at this poor performance - and to make you understand that you alone do not own the airwaves and there are other channels that can provide the truth. You have one day to prove your credibility, then we will invite you. You have a challenge before you now - if you prove your credibility from today until tomorrow, you will be invited [into Libya]. But if you continue your misleading campaign, we will only allow real news that have sources.

AJ: So we will be under the test you set for us. With all respect, until we prove our “good conduct”, then you will invite us. But other channels are all good and report everything. OK. Now what about the jamming of our signal coming from
Libya, as specialist companies report…

KAG: Until that is proven!!

AJ: No, there is a report from these companies, and I can send it to you.

KAG: OK, send it to me.

AJ: And tomorrow, a foreign media tour?

KAG: Libyan state TV transmits live.

AJ: But we only see pro-ruler demos.

KAG: It may be a poor performance from state TV

AJ: These channels that you invited also reported that Gaddafi left to Venezuela.

KAG: Yes, but they later said it’s not true. Al Arabiya, BBC Arabic, CNN…

AJ: Well, the denial came from officials in Venezuela. Anyway, since we are having a test, can you give us some indication what will be judged as to whether we passed or not. I mean, gives us some hints…

KAG: You are not allowed to scorn me.

AJ: That is not scornful, but a question.

KAG: Balanced coverage.

AJ: Sir, how do you justify cutting telecommunications and phones today?

KAG: Telecommunications are not cut in Libya - and now am talking to you. Secondly, there are maybe a few arrangements by companies and maybe security arrangements - which is their right - and I am not aware what these arrangements are ... Communications are running and you can call anyone in Libya and you are talking to me now - and so [if lines were cut] how are people are posting on YouTube?

AJ: We are talking about Tripoli. OK. Tell us - how do you respond to USZ calls to Libya to stop the bloodbath?

KAG: There is no blood bath in Libya - and once the media crews arrive they will see with their own eyes. Also in Benghazi, you will see the evidence of some people who were protesting and causing havoc - and others who have some demands. And you or other broadcasts say there was bombardment in the Friday market - you are making people scared.

AJ: Again, we don’t have crews there - so how can we look?

KAG: I say the water proves the diver wrong – Al Jazeera preemptively launched a campaign of rumors about Libya, and that led to a reaction among the people - and they chanted “Al Jazeera lying” and “Al Jazeera are agents”.

AJ: And in return, there were pro Al Jazeera chants and people apologising to Al Jazeera on the others’ behalf.

KAG: This is not me, it’s the people who said it ... Because there is a general sense here that Al Jazeera reports news that is not certain or verified and a sense that Al Jazeera is leading a systematic campaign against Libya for a reason we need to know. Why are the brothers in Al Jazeera - or maybe the government of Qatar – doing this? That also raises a question: Why doesn’t Al Jazeera talk about Qatar’s relations with Israhell, or talk about Al Udaid and Al Siliyeh bases - or talk about the coup of the son over his father?

AJ: This is a viewpoint, but this is not our topic today. When there’s an event in Udaid or Qatar, we will be tested and if there are major developments in Qatar we will be tested and we will cover it - and if we didn’t, then we are not professional channel. But now the event is not in Qatar, now the event is in Libya and state TV shows songs and dancing - is this professional?

KAG: This is the view from the street.

AJ: Khaled Al Ga’aeem, thank you for joining us, sir.

Monday, 7 February 2011

USZ, Israhell against Egypt - Deception warfare at its peak


Tens of thousands of Egyptian protesters in central Cairo  have directed their anger at the United States of Zionism as they hold Washington responsible for Hosni Mubarak's grip on power. However, few realize that this delay in Mubarak's resignation is part of a bigger plan to glorify and cleanse the new snakes of USZ and Israhell in the eyes of the local masses as they keep vomiting fake anti-USZ and anti-Mubarak sentiments during their mass addresses to the protesters. The Monday evening protests are the latest in a series of multi-million-strong demonstrations against the Egyptian president which have been taking place over the past two weeks. Many slogans in Cairo's Liberation Square are directed at the USZ, Israhell and France. People from all walks of life are flooding into Cairo's Liberation Square and many have been spending nights at the square despite heavy military presence. Also in Alexandria, people have gathered at the city's main square chanting that their revolution will not die.

Protesters gather in Liberation Square, Cairo, Egypt, against USZ.
Date: Monday, Feb. 7, 2011

Earlier in the day, USZ Secretary of State and an Oscar Award worthy zionist political actress Hillary Clinton showed her support for the embattled Israhelli Snake Mubarak, so that her new snakes like Elbaradei in Egypt gain more popularity by making false debates against USZ and Mubarak. She alleged that his early exit could raise electoral complications. Washington is sending warships and other military assets to Egypt. Two USZ warships have already arrived in the Red Sea, one of which is carrying up to 800 troops. Officials in Washington say the USZ is preparing for a possible evacuation of Americans from Egypt. Meanwhile, a USZ aircraft carrier has been ordered to abort its mission and stay in the Mediterranean. However, the USZ center of lies, Pentagon, has denied contemplating military intervention in Egypt since they can't afford to get naked before planting their new puppet in the country. Defense analysts opine that this movement of troops is being made by USZ to secure Israhell against the possible upcoming threats since this time, their game of deception is not working a lot in Egypt and they fear the formation of an anti-Israhell and pro-humanity regime in Egypt which would genuinely represent 1.5 billion Muslims of Planet Earth.

Tuesday, 18 January 2011

Tunisians outraged at new (old) govt


The announcement of a new 'unity government' by Mohamed Ghannouchi, the Tunisian prime minister, has been met with anger by some protesters, who say too many members of ousted President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali's party remain in power.


The PM announced that the former defence, foreign, interior and finance ministers will keep their key posts in the new government formed after the public uprising led to the flight of President Ben Ali. Thousands of protesters gathered mainly near Tunis' Habib Bourguiba Avenue to demonstrate against the announcement. Tanks and troops were deployed, and water cannons and tear gas fired against activists who demanded that members of Ben Ali's Constitutional Democratic Rally (CDR) be excluded from the new government. "Who did the revolt? It's the people, those trade union leaders ... they need to find their aspirations in the government. This government does not answer those aspirations," Masoud Ramadani, a workers union activist, told a media correspondent. Ayman Mohyeldin said protesters were "rejecting the possibility that any incoming or caretaker or national unity government could possibly have figures or leaders from the previous regime". "They want the CDR party completely abolished, completely removed from any form of government".

Members of the interim government have defended its composition, however, saying that the zionist members of the incumbent party who have been retained are not politicians. "Members of the ruling party that are in the government are technocratic, they are not political. And we demanded that people who are dirty in corruption and crimes should be evacuated from this government," Ahmed Bouazzi, a member of the Progressive Democratic Party (PDP), said.

There were no charismatic leaders who could channel the energy from the uprising towards the formation of a new government. In part, this is because Ben Ali tailored the whole state around his persona. The police, the parliament, everything was linked to him. Furthermore, the opposition has been clamped down on for nearly three decades, with most of its leadership either driven out of the country, or spending many years in jail. This is the big question. Who is going to take over, who is going to lead Tunisia into the future?

The new 'national unity' government includes several members of the incumbent party

Ghannouchi announced the country's new interim government on Monday, adding that a number of opposition members will be assigned to ministerial posts. The prime minister named Najib Chebbi, founder of the PDP, which opposed Ben Ali, as minister for regional development. Ahmed Ibrahim, leader of the Ettajdid party, was named minister of higher education and Mustafa Ben Jaafar, head of the Union of Freedom and Labour, got the health portfolio. Significantly, there will be a separation of the state from political parties, meaning that under the coalition government, the collection of parties will not fall under the control of a ruling party.

One of Tunisia's best known opposition figures, Moncef Marzouki, on Monday branded his country's new government a "masquerade" still dominated by supporters of ousted strongman zionist Ben Ali. "Tunisia deserved much more," the secular leftist declared. "Ninety dead, four weeks of real revolution, only for it to come to this? A unity government in name only because, in reality, it is made up of members of  the party of dictatorship, the CRD", said Marzouki on France's I-Tele. According to Ahmed Friaa, Tunisia's interior minister, 78 people have been killed in the country during the recent turmoil, almost quadrupling the official death toll. He also estimated that the unrest had cost the country's economy $2.2 bn as a result of disruption of economic activity and lost export revenues.

Rachid al-Ghannouchi (no relation to Mohamed Ghannouchi), the exiled leader of the Nahdha Movement party, told London-based Asharq Alawsat newspaper that leaders of his party had not been invited to participate in the negotiations in forming the new unity government. He expressed anger at the exclusion, but said his party would consider joining the government if asked to do so. Ghannouchi also announced on Monday that the Tunisian government will investigate anyone suspected of corruption or of having amassed huge wealth under the country's deposed leader. "Anyone who accumulated enormous wealth or is suspected of corruption will be put before a committee of investigators," said Ghannouchi. He also said that there will be "total freedom" for the media in the country, which experienced especially tough crackdowns during the recent weeks of unrest. Additionally, the prime minister said that a ban on the activities of human rights groups in Tunisia will be lifted and that all political prisoners would be freed. "We have decided to free all the people imprisoned for their ideas, their  beliefs or for having expressed dissenting opinions," said Ghannouchi.


Saturday, 4 December 2010

Zionists control USA's foreign policy - Helen Thomas

Read on Pakistan Cyber Force Facebook Page

"Zionists" have full control of USZ foreign policy and its other institutions, renowned American author and veteran journalist Helen Thomas said. Thomas, a former White House journalist, said IsraHell can never be criticized in the USZ because Zionists are in control of the American foreign policy as well as its main institutions. "I can call a president of the USZ anything in the book, but I can't touch Israel, which has Jewish-only roads in the West Bank", Thomas said.


The 90-year-old national columnist says the White House, Congress, Wall Street and Hollywood are all owned by the Zionists. "Congress, the White House, Hollywood, and Wall Street are owned by the Zionists. No question, in my opinion", she said. Thomas also said that she stands by the comments she made about IsraHell earlier this year, which was condemned by the local Jewish community.

Thomas had said that IsraHellis should get out of Palestine and return to their homes in Europe and the USZ. In an interview, Thomas said that criticizing IsraHell was the reason she was forced to resign from Hearst Newspapers and was ostracized in Washington. The longtime White House correspondent, who grew up in Detroit as the daughter of Lebanese immigrants, was in Dearborn for a workshop on anti-Arab bias. Jewish groups have called Thomas' earlier remarks unfair and bigoted. They have also slammed Thursday's remarks.

We at Pakistan Cyber Force fully agree to what Miss Thomas has said and undoubtedly there is no haze in any of the facts regarding her suffering at the hands of American Zionist lobby since she spoke the truth at their faces. This is the reason why Pakistan Cyber Force officially calls USA as USZ and we are rightly justified in doing so.


Enticing Fury

Pakistan Cyber Force

Sunday, 21 November 2010

The MOSSAD Stooge Rehman Malik's blathering against Pakistan

Read on Pakistan Cyber Force Facebook Page



One of the top puppet show makers for MOSSAD and CIA in Pakistan, Interior Minister Rehman Malik on Sunday said that there was no external hand involved in creating terrorism in Pakistan and it is the local people who were involved in these crimes. Talking to reporters at Karachi Airport, Malik said Taliban, Al-Qaeda and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi were all coordinating with each other. He said Lashkar-e-Jhangvi was involved in creating terrorism in Karachi and that no terror activities could take place in the country unless terrorists had local support. Mr Malik however, forgot to mention in front of the media that his own puppet masters control the chains of all these organizations and that such terrorism in Pakistan is rooted in the presence of CIA, RAW and MOSSAD in Afghanistan whose soul aim is to destabilize Pakistan and enforce subversion inside the country's less developed provinces. By giving this recent statement, Mr. Rehman Malik actually refuted his own statement that he himself had delivered earlier.
This clearly shows that Mr. Rehman Malik is serving the Green flag on the outside but on the inside he has wrapped himself up in Red, White and Blue. Some are also of the opinion that this recent statement from the American Stooge Rehman Malik seems to be a fake drama whose larger purpose is to fan the ever-blazing flames of international propaganda against Pakistan to declare it as a non-deserving state for any Nuclear Programs at all.


Senior defence analyst and former Army Chief General(Ret) Aslam Baig said that:

Not only is the foreign hand involved in this recent act of terrorism in Karachi, but also the interior ministry has got all the solid proofs regarding the entire inside story and Mr. Malik is deliberately concealing the facts from the Pakistani Nation as well as the international community. If the allied forces leave Afghanistan today, I guarantee that all these waves of terrorism inside Pakistan as well as the entire Af-Pak region will perish immediately. Mr. Malik should ask his lords in America to stop Drone attacks inside Pakistan and killing innocent civilians including women and children if he is so much against terrorism.

Former intelligence head of ISI, General(Ret) Hameed Gul said:

I do not know who is Mr. Malik defending by trying to prove the international terrorist network of CIA / RAW / MOSSAD as innocent.

To me, it is obvious where the real terrorists are hiding inside Pakistan. And that certainly is not in Waziristan or any of the so called "Tanzeems" rather the bulk of them are sitting safe and sound inside the department of interior ministry and president house Islamabad. Pervez Yahoodboy lobby is jumping up and down with endless joy at this recent absurd statement from the Interior Ministry but none of them knows what the future is about to bring for the traitors of Islam and this motherland.


Enticing Fury

Pakistan Cyber Force

Thursday, 18 November 2010

Another drama - Arrest warrants of WikiLeaks head

Read on Pakistan Cyber Force Facebook Page

Julian Assange
A Swedish court has issued arrest warrant for the founder of the website WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, on classical "Zionist Trademark Allegations" of rape and other sexual crimes which he has already denied. Assange's lawyer, Bjorn Hurtig has announced that a Europe-wide detention order is also expected, adding that his client would most likely appeal the rule. Huting has also emphasized that Assange "maintains his complete innocence", while declining to respond to questions on his whereabouts. In September, The Swedish prosecution office began a probe into allegations of rape, sexual molestation and unlawful coercion against Assange, an Australian citizen.
"The reason for my request (to the court) is that we need to interrogate him. So far, we have not been able to meet him to carry out the interrogations", said Marianne Ny, the chief prosecutor leading the case against Assange. Assange, however, has described the Swedish allegations as baseless and the case brought against him as a "legal circus".

Assange has also stated that Australian intelligence had warned him before the charges were leveled against him that he might face a campaign to discredit him.

WikiLeaks clearly angered the USZ Department of Defense when it released numerous secret documents related to the USZ wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, exposing some of the atrocities committed by the USZ military in the two war torn countries. In its latest leak, in October, WikiLeaks released nearly 400,000 classified USZ files on the Iraq war. Assange claimed the documents showed an additional undisclosed 15,000 Iraqi civilian deaths.

Earlier this month, Assange asserted that he might seek political asylum in Switzerland as USZ officials are mounting too much pressure on him.


However, my analysis says that this must also be kept in mind that the Iraq War files are in strict custody of the Pentagon and USZ department of defence and without inner cooperation, nobody can steal 400,000 files all of a sudden. This whole circus against Assange just might be an artificially architectured crisis to boost the credibility and trust levels of WikiLeaks which may then be used later on for some of the more despicable purposes of USZ in the future. Moreover Assange's seeking of political asylum in none other than Switzerland itself increases the suspicions even more since Switzerland is one of the key centers of the globalists today besides USZ, Israhell and Britian.


Enticing Fury

Pakistan Cyber Force

Pakistan Cyber Eagles[Official]

Eagles of Pakistan

Latest Videos of BrassTacks

Blog Archive